The written information security procedure is the document the Israeli Privacy Authority asks for first in any audit. The 2017 Information Security Regulations require it for every database, at every security level — and Amendment 13 raises the price of getting it wrong. Here is what a serious procedure looks like, what changes by security level, and how it integrates with the database definition document.
Security procedure in brief
- Legal basis: 2017 Information Security Regulations
- Required for: Every database at every security level
- Typical procedure length: 15-40 pages
- Update: Annual or upon significant change
- Signed by: Database owner + Information Security Manager
- Language: Hebrew; English if relevant to staff
- Employee training: Periodic per Regulation 7; annual is standard practice
- Included in DPO as a Service: Yes
Why a written security procedure — 2017 regulations requirement
The 2017 Information Security Regulations are not a recommendation — they are binding secondary legislation. Article 4 explicitly requires a written, signed, and current information security procedure for every database, at every security level (basic, medium, high). The procedure is the single document the Israeli Privacy Authority asks for first in an audit. Without it, you have an automatic finding — regardless of what controls actually exist in practice. A good procedure is not a wall poster; it is the working document that translates law into day-to-day operations: who is allowed to do what, with which data, under what conditions, and what to do when something goes wrong.
Three security levels and their procedure implications
The regulations divide databases into three levels. Basic level — a small database, non-sensitive data, no third-party transfers. Procedure is short (15-20 pages) and focuses on appointments, permissions, backups, and incidents. Medium level — sensitive data (health, financial, biometric) or 100,000+ data subjects, or vendor transfers. Procedure expands to 25-30 pages with documented risk survey, periodic penetration testing, and stricter permission controls. High level — sensitive data at scale or critical national infrastructure. Procedure is 35-40 pages and adds detailed monitoring, logging, physical access controls, and quarterly review.
Mandatory clauses (appointments, permissions, backups, incidents, deletion)
Every procedure — at every level — must contain at minimum: (1) Appointments — database owner, Information Security Manager, and if relevant DPO; (2) Authorized users and permission policy — who is allowed access, on what basis, with what authentication method; (3) Backups — frequency, location, recovery testing; (4) Incident handling — who is notified, within what timeframe, who decides on Authority/data-subject notification (see incident response); (5) Retention and deletion — how long each data type is retained, and what the secure deletion procedure is.
Additional clauses at medium security level
At medium level (per the First Schedule to the Regulations) the procedure must add: access logging and routine log review (Regulation 10); periodic compliance audit every 24 months (Regulation 16) — and at high level, a risk survey and penetration test every 18 months (Regulations 5(c)-(d)); vendor management — every vendor with database access requires a written agreement, security questionnaire, and outsourcing terms per Regulation 15 (see vendor privacy); encryption — encryption requirement at rest and in transit, including key management; employee training — periodic training per Regulation 7 (annual refresh is the accepted practice), documented, with comprehension checks; access review — semi-annual review of who has access to which database and is the permission still justified.
Additional clauses at high security level (logs, monitoring, physical access)
High security level adds three significant layers. Logs and monitoring — detailed logging of every access to sensitive data, log retention at least 24 months, anomaly monitoring (failed login attempts, unusual access from a new country, bulk export). Physical access — production environment in a locked server room, access by ID card with documentation, security camera at server room entrance. Penetration testing — annual external penetration testing, with documentation of findings and treatment. Quarterly review — quarterly procedure review, not just annual. Many organizations underestimate the cost of high level — and discover it only when the Authority shows up.
Relationship to database definition document
The security procedure and the database definition document are two sides of one coin. The definition document describes what is in the database — fields, purposes, data subjects, vendors, retention period. The procedure describes how we protect what is in the database. The two documents must be perfectly consistent — every database vendor in the definition document must appear in the vendor section of the procedure; every retention period in the definition document must match the deletion section of the procedure. In an audit, the Authority compares the two documents side by side. Any inconsistency = a finding.
Employee training on the procedure
A procedure no one read is a procedure that does not exist. The regulations require annual employee training in information security and privacy — and require documentation of who participated, when, with what comprehension test. A standard 60-minute training covers: what is personal information, the legal duty under Amendment 13, key clauses of the organizational procedure, how to identify a phishing attempt, what to do when a security incident is suspected, how to handle a data subject access request. Training tailored by role (technical employees vs. administrative employees) is significantly more effective than generic training, and shows the Authority a serious approach.
Periodic maintenance and updates
A security procedure is not a one-time document. The 2017 regulations require annual update at minimum, and immediate update upon significant change — adding a new system, change of central vendor, organizational change, addition of new database. Practically, we recommend a fixed quarterly review: 30 minutes with the Information Security Manager and DPO, going through the appointment list, vendor list, and incident log of the past quarter. Approximately every three years it is worth bringing in an external consultant to refresh the procedure from scratch — laws and threats change faster than organizations update.
How we build custom procedures
We do not sell a generic Word template. Every procedure we build starts with a one-hour conversation with the database owner and Information Security Manager, continues with mapping the actual databases and existing controls, and ends with a procedure precisely tailored to the actual security level and processing types. As part of our DPO as a Service and GRC privacy packages, the procedure is delivered together with the database definition document and employee training kit. The procedure is signed by the database owner and Information Security Manager, and the annual update is included in the retainer.
Need a security procedure that survives an audit?
30-minute call, quote within 48 hours, signed procedure within 3-6 weeks.